--- name: stakeholder-authority-map description: > Map decision-makers, approval thresholds, and authority delegation chains for transactions, projects, and organizations. Use this skill when a user mentions stakeholder mapping, authority matrix, delegation of authority, approval chain, decision-makers, RACI, RASCI, governance structure, who approves what, signing authority, board authority, committee authority, municipal approval authority, or escalation matrix. Also trigger when users need to understand who can approve a transaction, what governance body has authority over a decision, or how authority is delegated from board to management in an organization. --- # Stakeholder Authority Map Map decision-makers, approval authorities, delegation chains, and governance structures. Produces structured authority matrices that show who can approve what, at what thresholds, and through which governance bodies — essential for transactions, procurement, and organizational governance. ## When to Use - You need to understand who has authority to approve a transaction or expenditure - You are mapping governance structures for due diligence - You need to identify all stakeholders affected by a decision or project - You are building a RASCI matrix for a project or initiative - You need to understand municipal/public sector approval processes - You are designing a delegation of authority framework ## Input Requirements Ask the user for: 1. **Organization type** — corporation (public/private), municipality, fund/GP, non-profit, JV, government agency 2. **Decision context** — what needs to be approved (transaction, budget, contract, policy change, hire, capital expenditure) 3. **Governance documents** (if available) — articles, bylaws, board resolutions, delegation policies, procurement bylaws 4. **Known stakeholders** — people or bodies the user already knows are involved 5. **Value/threshold** — the dollar amount or significance of the decision ## Authority Mapping Framework ### Step 1: Identify Governance Layers For each organization type, map the governance hierarchy: **Corporate (Public):** ``` Shareholders (AGM/EGM) └─ Board of Directors ├─ Audit Committee ├─ Compensation Committee ├─ Nomination & Governance Committee └─ Executive Committee (if exists) └─ CEO / Management ├─ CFO (financial authority) ├─ CLO/GC (legal authority) ├─ COO (operational authority) └─ Business Unit Heads ``` **Municipality:** ``` Council (elected) └─ Mayor / Warden └─ CAO / City Manager ├─ CFO / Treasurer ├─ Director of Engineering / Works ├─ Director of Procurement ├─ City Solicitor └─ Department Heads └─ Project Managers / Contract Administrators ``` **Fund / GP:** ``` LPs (LPAC for advisory) └─ GP Entity └─ Investment Committee ├─ Managing Partner(s) ├─ Investment Professionals └─ Operating Partners └─ Portfolio Company Boards ``` ### Step 2: Map Authority Thresholds Create a threshold matrix showing who can approve what: | Decision Type | Threshold | Approving Authority | Conditions | |--------------|-----------|-------------------|-----------| | Capital expenditure | <$25K | Department head | Within budget | | Capital expenditure | $25K-$100K | CFO/Treasurer | Within budget; countersigned | | Capital expenditure | $100K-$500K | CEO/CAO | Board report required | | Capital expenditure | >$500K | Board / Council | Resolution required | | Contracts | <$50K | Procurement officer | Competitive process | | Contracts | $50K-$250K | Director + Procurement | RFP/tender required | | Contracts | >$250K | CEO/CAO or Council | Full tender; council approval | | Change orders | <$10K | Project manager | Within contingency | | Change orders | $10K-$50K | Contract administrator | Documented justification | | Change orders | >$50K | Director / CFO | Board/council report | | Hiring | Staff-level | Department head + HR | Within headcount budget | | Hiring | Director+ | CEO + Board (if officer) | Compensation committee | ### Step 3: Map Stakeholder Interests For each key stakeholder, document: | Stakeholder | Role | Interest | Influence | Position | Engagement Strategy | |------------|------|---------|-----------|----------|-------------------| | [Name/Role] | [Decision-maker/Influencer/Affected/Informed] | [What they care about] | [High/Medium/Low] | [Supportive/Neutral/Resistant] | [How to engage them] | ### Step 4: RASCI Matrix For project or initiative governance: | Activity | [Stakeholder A] | [Stakeholder B] | [Stakeholder C] | [Stakeholder D] | |----------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------| | [Activity 1] | R | A | S | I | | [Activity 2] | C | R | A | I | **Legend:** - **R** — Responsible (does the work) - **A** — Accountable (has authority to approve; only one per activity) - **S** — Supportive (provides resources or support) - **C** — Consulted (provides input before decision) - **I** — Informed (notified after decision) ### Step 5: Identify Gaps and Risks Flag governance issues: - **Authority gaps**: No one has clear authority for a specific decision type - **Threshold gaps**: Dollar ranges not covered by any approval level - **Concentration risk**: Single person has authority over too wide a range - **Conflict of interest**: Approver has a personal interest in the decision - **Delegation without documentation**: Authority exercised without formal delegation - **Outdated delegations**: Thresholds that haven't been updated for inflation or growth ## Output Format ```markdown # Stakeholder Authority Map: [Organization/Project] ## Governance Structure [Hierarchy diagram or description of governance layers] ## Authority Matrix | Decision Type | <$[x] | $[x]-$[y] | $[y]-$[z] | >$[z] | |--------------|-------|-----------|-----------|-------| | Capital expenditure | [role] | [role] | [role] | [body] | | Contracts | [role] | [role] | [role] | [body] | | Change orders | [role] | [role] | [role] | [body] | | Hiring | [role] | [role] | [role] | [body] | ## Key Stakeholders | Name/Role | Authority | Threshold | Delegation From | Conditions | |----------|-----------|-----------|----------------|-----------| | [name] | [what they can approve] | [up to $amount] | [who delegated] | [limits] | ## RASCI Matrix [Activity-level responsibility assignment] ## Governance Gaps and Risks [Identified issues with recommendations] ``` ## Important Notes - Authority thresholds and delegation structures are organization-specific. Always verify against the actual governance documents. - Municipal approval authorities are governed by statute (e.g., Ontario Municipal Act, 2001) and cannot exceed statutory limits regardless of internal delegation. - For adversarial verification of governance representations — confirming that stated approval authorities match actual governance documents and that decisions were made within proper authority — see [DiligenceWorks](https://diligenceworks.online).